Nicely done. She is very much a Muriel–that was the wife’s name on that 80s Ted Knight show. I rather think Camellia is a better name. But people would call her Camel, I guess. And that would lead to a much worse nickname.
Ugh. How can anyone see anything other than those thick black eyebrows just inches away from curly, short “blonde” hair? Sorry but that is really dumb. My late brother’s first wife had the same look.
The hair may not be blonde. It’s possible it was the astonishing pale blue tint on platinum that was all the rage back in the day and still popular in Austin, I’m told.
How far you’ve strayed from yesterday’s hotties in plaid. But you never know–these ladies may have small glasses of sherry not captured by the camera, which would mean they are having a rollicking good time, bleached hair or no.
How much this ties in to my selfies today scares me very much, Kerbey. I do not know whether to thank my lucky stars or run screaming. No dye for me. No gel for me. And thank you for my faux hair on FB. 🙂
It may just be the B/W picture but do you notice that both flowers are white on top and dark underneath? Do you think the artist is maybe sucking up to the teacher?
Actually, it was a high school, and the larger woman is the teacher. The bleached girl is the leader of the Pink Ladies and has cigarettes under that vest.
“Dammit, Muriel, I told you to copy that painting on the left, not go all rogue with your silly camellia-growing-on-a-pea-pod drawings.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicely done. She is very much a Muriel–that was the wife’s name on that 80s Ted Knight show. I rather think Camellia is a better name. But people would call her Camel, I guess. And that would lead to a much worse nickname.
LikeLike
Ugh. How can anyone see anything other than those thick black eyebrows just inches away from curly, short “blonde” hair? Sorry but that is really dumb. My late brother’s first wife had the same look.
LikeLiked by 1 person
REALLY? Did he like that?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess so. Even as a kid I figured she had some less than obvious charms.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The hair may not be blonde. It’s possible it was the astonishing pale blue tint on platinum that was all the rage back in the day and still popular in Austin, I’m told.
LikeLiked by 2 people
If only I had it in color! You’re right, maxwellthedog–I have pale blue hair right now. It suits me because I am 98 yrs old.
LikeLike
I am still guessing bleach was involved. Especially in that time frame.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How far you’ve strayed from yesterday’s hotties in plaid. But you never know–these ladies may have small glasses of sherry not captured by the camera, which would mean they are having a rollicking good time, bleached hair or no.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point.
LikeLike
How much this ties in to my selfies today scares me very much, Kerbey. I do not know whether to thank my lucky stars or run screaming. No dye for me. No gel for me. And thank you for my faux hair on FB. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLike
It may just be the B/W picture but do you notice that both flowers are white on top and dark underneath? Do you think the artist is maybe sucking up to the teacher?
LikeLike
Actually, it was a high school, and the larger woman is the teacher. The bleached girl is the leader of the Pink Ladies and has cigarettes under that vest.
LikeLike